Francesco Molino
Grand Trio Concertant for flute or
violin, viola and guitar, op. 30, new Tecla edition (April 2004)
Introduction by Brian Jeffery
"It was love at first sight",
writes Francesco Biraghi about the first time that he and his
colleagues played through Molino's Grand Trio Concertant op. 30. At
that time it had not yet been published in a modern edition, and they
were merely trying it out, but "it showed itself as a clear
classical work, very well fitting the bowed instruments and quite
virtuosic in the concertante guitar part". Read Biraghi's extended preface to this work.
Actually, in my opinion this is one of
the greatest of all chamber works with guitar, full of originality and
beauty. (And it is not particularly difficult.) A rich larghetto leads
into the theme, stated by the violin (or flute, see below) with the
other two instruments underneath. Variation 1 is given to the viola
and guitar with rapid passages with the violin just commenting
occasionally. In variation 2 the guitar comes into its own while the
viola pizzicatos its way along, the violin just listening this time.
Then in variation 3 the violin has shimmering runs. In parts of
variation 4 the viola and guitar are again heard in duo. Variation 5
is busy for everybody. Variation 6 is again for the guitar, with
running triplets that never seem to cease.
In the minuet, suddenly in the viola
part we seem to hear a hurdy-gurdy, and in the trio the guitar shines.
Yet again, in the rondo the guitar is given its fair opportunity,
again once or twice in a short duet with the viola.
In short, it's a work full of grace and
elegance and humour, full of musicality. And the guitar doesn't just
accompany the others, it's a very worthwhile part.
This is the first modern edition of
this work, which as far as I know has never before been published
since Molino's time. I made this present edition here in Hebe as a
result of Francesco Biraghi's suggestion and I am grateful to him for
this very good idea. It is now directly downloadable online here in
Hebe, a fully modern edition with score and parts. It may later be
published by Tecla in a conventional paper edition, but for the moment
it is available only here online in Hebe. Any guitarist who plays with
other musicians will welcome the fact that it is now available.
FLUTE OR VIOLIN?
In the earlier trios op. 4 of Molino,
only flute was mentioned and there was no sign of violin fingering.
But in this trio op. 30, and again in the Second Grand Trio Concertant
op. 45 of a few years later, the title-pages both say for "flûte
ou violon". Was the top part in opp. 30 and 45 really conceived
to be played equally well by either instrument? Or were they really
composed for one of the two instruments rather than the other?
In the case of op. 30 it can be argued
either way. Molino knew both instruments well. He was himself a
violinist who composed two violin concertos, and the fact that the
trios op. 4 specify the flute shows that he was at home with the flute
also. Biraghi prefers violin for both trios op. 30 and op. 45 and
writes: "I actually prefer to play these trios always with two
bowed instruments, also because Molino was a good violinist and
violist. Moreover you see, on the Breitkopf edition of the Trio op. 45
(in your Tecla collection) there is a clear indication of a 'flauto o
violino' part, but at page 4, 5th line, first bar you find '2e corde'.
. . I heartily believe that also Molino had in mind the violin better
than the flute. Maybe in op. 30 the flute matches in a better way the
part, but de gustibus non disputandum est!"
In the case of the slightly later
Second Grand Trio Concertant op. 45, although the title-page says
"flûte ou violon", the part contains some fingering
specifically for the violin, so the violin was definitely in mind in
that work although it can perfectly well alternatively be played on
the flute.
In op. 30 the part says Flauto only
with no trace of fingering for either instrument, but the title-page
says "flûte ou violon". Moreover, Molino was himself the
publisher, so the words "flûte ou violon" to some extent
have his authority, which they would have to a lesser extent if the
work had been published by some third-party publisher.
We must leave it up to you, to the
musicians who will use this edition, to decide whether to play the top
part on flute or violin. Molino was a violinist by profession as well
as a guitarist. So as far as one can see, it can be played by either.
On the other hand, flute would give a different balance.
* * * * *
The Grand Trio Concertant op. 30 was
first published by Molino acting as his own publisher and in
conjunction with La Lyre Moderne, rue Vivienne no. 6, in Paris
probably in the early 1820s (not later than 1824 because it is listed
in the 1824 supplement to Whistling), as parts only, no score. This
present edition has taken as its source a copy of that original
edition.
The wording of the original title-page
is: Grand Trio Concertant pour Flûte ou Violon, Alto et Guitare,
Dédié à Monsieur François J.J. Snoeck, Professeur de Guitare et de
Violon, par François Molino. Opera 30. Prix: 7f. 50c. A Paris, chez
l'Auteur, Rue de l'Echelle, No. 8, Et à la Lyre Moderne, au Magasin
de Musique et d'Instrumens, Rue Vivienne no. 6. Propriété de
l'Auteur. Déposé à la Direction.
No changes have been made to the music
other than such things as changing "Tema" to
"Theme". All fingering, ornaments, etc., are original. The
notation in the original edition is careful in its details, for
example the flute/violin part in the variations bars 103, 111, etc.
The music engraving for this edition
was made by Alexander V. Trukhin.
I wish to express my thanks to Mário
Carreira and his colleagues who kindly proofread the Molino trios and
suggested corrections. Of course any errors which remain are my
reponsibility.
Brian Jeffery
* * * * *
NOTES
VARIATIONS
The chords in the viola and guitar
parts in bar 1 and in many similar places, are grouped together thus
in the original and the grouping is kept here in this edition.
36 the viola part is thus in the
original. Personally I think it is fine. However, anyone who considers
that the fourth note is incorrect against the c sharp in the guitar,
could change the fourth note to g.
MINUET
9 The viola here seems to recall a
rustic hurdy-gurdy.
The Trio is almost like a guitar solo.
The minuet has 33 bars, and in a normal
minuet one would expect eight-bar sections which of course would give
32 bars. The extra bar is bar 13. However, that bar is very clear in
all three parts, there is no doubt about it. I wonder whether this
extra bar, so unusual in a minuet, could have something to do with the
"rustic" effect possibly suggested by the
"hurdy-gurdy" in the viola part? Performers can play it as
it stands. On the other hand, if they feel that the extra bar really
does disturb the structure too much, then it is up to them to decide
whether they wish to remove bar 13.
RONDO
In the rondo, from bar 73 a rallentando
may be suggested. Also at bars 137-9.
109 viola the natural sign is
editorial.
115-116 flute the natural signs are
editorial.
* * * * *
In the original the ornaments are not
quite consistent. For example, in the Larghetto bar 1 the grace note
in the viola part has a slash through it, but the grace note in the
flute part does not. Because the musical phrase is the same, it is
best that they should be the same. In this edition the slash has been
removed from the viola. Also in bar 30 and bar 36.
Dots and wedges. In the original
edition, in the variations, the viola part in bar 57 uses a dot and in
bars 58 and 59 a wedge (that is to say, a short line or stroke, often
wedge-shaped in modern notation). The distinction between them in
early 19th century editions is often very intuitive, and in this
edition common sense has been used.
All Hebe files are free immediately
online if you (or your library) are a Hebe subscriber.
Back to the main Molino page which
includes links to all of Molino's trios opp. 4, 30, and 45. |